本页主题: how has chinese revisionism failed 打印 | 加为IE收藏 | 复制链接 | 收藏主题 | 上一主题 | 下一主题

olu
级别: 新手上路


精华: 0
发帖: 27
威望: 37 点
红花: 270 朵
贡献值: 0 点
在线时间:4(小时)
注册时间:2017-01-14
最后登录:2017-07-08

 how has chinese revisionism failed

chinese revisionists claim that they have brought wealth to china. their examples include skyscrapers, and $1000 hand bags. but let's look at it from another angle. when deng decided to take china into capitalism, he believed that by giving concesions to foreigners, china would be on its way to prosperity, and stability. this turned out to be false. while china imports a lot of expensive products from foreign countries, including hand bags, iphones, starbucks coffee, leather shoes, audis, bmw, boeing, expensive construction material, it doesnt do much in terms of providing high quality food. in fact, china exports most of its highest quality foods. you see, the revisionists have got it all wrong. you should take in high quality food, and ignore the $1000 hand bags. $1000 hand bags, skyscrapers, and coffee are completely unecesary, while high quality healthy foods are necesary. look around china today, and junk food is available on every corner. however, if you wanted to find healthy foods, youd have to walk a few km to find it.
another way in which you know revisionism has failed is by looking at these ridiculously expensive shoes, hand bags, and iphones. most of this is made in china, however, the profits go to the west, and other exploiters from south korea, hong kong, taiwan, japan, and singapore. very few of the profits actually go to real chinese people. what the revisionists have done, is in essence, re-enslave china. the chinese are paying top dollar for products that they made themselves, and handing over the money to foreigners. the rise of china has mainly benefited foreigners, and not china. in fact, for every piece of development, the west, and their pupets, has to get a piece of the pie. for example, if theres a construction project, then maybe 50% or more, of the materials must be purchased from the westerners, and exploiters. these are the preconditions of china's development. that doesnt sound very promising.
looking at taiwan, and hong kong, china's failures are obvious. deng believed that if he took capitalism to the extreme, then hk, and tw would naturally submit. this turned out to be completely false. china has given hand outs, and concesions to hk, and tw for 40yrs, yet this has largely gotten china nowhere. the reason for this is, hk, and tw are more anti chinese than anywhere else in the world. if youve given trillions in hand outs to these parasites, and theyre still anti chinese, what was the point of giving them hand outs in the first place? the core of this problem lies in the value system of china since the 70s. china capitulated in the 70s by accomodating the west, and surrendering the global peoples wars. these would be 2 of the biggest mistakes china ever made. in fact, china learned nothing from the mistakes of kruschev, and gorbachev who made similar mistakes only a few decades earlier. chinese revisionists dont realize that the only bargaining chip china had was from the global peoples war, and when that ended, china had no bargaining chips, and thats what led china into its enslaved form today. for whatever bizare reason, chinese leaders believed that the right path to go was to acomodate the west, and be inactive in global politics. as soon as china took this path, it began to align itself with compradores. as foolish as this may sound, deng may have really believed that giving concesions to the inperialists, and parasites would gain him respect. 40 years later, we see that it did not. in fact, even 11 years later, it did not, and that was aparent in 89 when the west tried to overthrow him. despite all the concesions deng gave the inperialists, and foreigners, the inperialists were very hostile towards deng, and china. deng also took this approach towards tw, and hk, and today's leadership continues in the same mistaken path. one of the biggest problems with the chinese approach is that they seek to cooperate with compradores worldwide in hopes of a pro chinese outcome, but this is actually impossible. a compradore is by default, loyal to his colonial masters, not to deviate from the path. the last thing in the world colonists want is for compradores to enact a pro chinese policy. this is why china has failed in tw for 40 years straight, with no end in sight. china continues to court the kmt in tw province. the kmt is made up largely of compradores. these compradores are very loyal to the west. most of them were probably educated by the west. just as 0bama was groomed by brezenski, kmt were groomed by their inperialist masters. it's very unlikely that these groomed pets of inperialists would turn on their masters to acomodate china. it's just not in the compradore nature to do this. it is no wonder why china's tw policy has failed for 40yrs straight. compradores are cold and calculating businessmen. they dont like taking risks. they know that the west has the muscle to make or break them. in fact, everyone knows this. compradores, whether in tw, hk, or globally, will not take these kinds of risks. even china itself admits that it does not hope for a pro chinese outcome anywhere on earth. the most that china can hope for is that countries dont become extremely anti chinese. now what kind of a pathetic goal is that? if countires dont hate china, then china feels it has already accomplished something. thats the sad state that chinese revisionism has brought us to. despite all the money spent, and all the sweat, blood, and tears, this is where the revisionists have taken us. for those of us who remember when the proletariat of the world believed that china would lead the 3world, it's a disapointment to see what china has become. not only has china not admited to its failures, it continues to tell people what a good job chinese capitalism has done for the world. the only ones that chinese capitalism has helped are compradores, and inperialists, neither of whom deserve any help. but the failure is here for us to see. to put it simply, china has courted compradores for 40yrs. hk, and tw remain strongly anti chinese. compradores are cowards who serve colonial masters. they dont care about their country. if anything happens, theyre the first ones to run. in fact, most of them probably have foreign citizenship already. no one in tw is talking about reunifying with china. in fact, it's quite the opposite. taiwanese are more sympathetic towards japan than china, and it wouldnt surprise me if the taiwanese fought on the japanese side if war broke out over the diaoyus. this is all a result of the failed non interference policy that china has. if you said something bad about the juz, they'll come after you agresively. you say something bad about china, all they can do is hold their head down. people are afraid of juz. theyre afraid of the japanese. theyre afraid of the west. the one country that no one is scared of is china. this is the pathetic state china is in today. chinese, under poor leadership, has lost its will to fight, and stand up for itself. theyve brought down the morale for what would be the free world, and forced people to accept western opresion, and even welcome it with open arms. china's softness has allowed the west to drum up a huge army of anti china supporters. animals can smell fear, and china isnt fooling anyone with its army modernization. we saw from the ussr that a strong military wont save you if you dont have a will to fight, and are led by weaklings. the west has shown its determination to fight china. however, china has shown little or no determination to defend its interest. thats what will make or break china. fighting does not only include military. it also includes prapaganda wars. china has done little to discredit the west in its media. in fact, the chinese media goes out of its way to avoid offending the west. with this kind of modus operandi, failure is inevitable. information warfare is one of the most important forms of warfare. in some ways, media has been understood as the 4th wing of the military, in addition to army, navy, and air force. if china is so weak in prapaganda, then the only thing one can assume is that china has already capitulated. if you compare china's media from 67 to 2017, china has clearly gone from a dragon to a snake. in 67, chinas media was hard hitting and captured the attention of youth across the world, from the 1st to 3rd world. today, theres no point in even reading chinese media, because it has no political position, and its stance is not noticably different from cnn, or bbc. why would anyone turn to xinhua, if xinhua is merely paroting cnn? china's media was put to the test time after time, and china folded every time. from syria, to libya, all china could do was agree with the west. anyone who looks at the situation in syria, and libya knows there is more than meets the eye, but you wont get any fruitful information from the chinese press.
chinas has taken a 180 degree turn since 67. worse yet, hongers are now talking about independence. notice in 67, hongers had an anti british, pro chinese riot. fast fwd to 2014, pro western hongers had an anti chinese riot. this shows how chinese power has shifted 180 degrees in the wrong direction. please explain to me how chinese revisionism does the world any good at all? china has taken this gorbachev stance of non interference, and giving hand outs to the west, more so than gorbachev could ever dream of. china is not only rewarding the west, and compradores for their anti chinese ways, but then sits idle as chaos burns. how much longer will china be misguided? they say when china awakens, the world will tremble, however, it appears that china has joined the bears, and gone into hibernation for what seems to be an ice age.
[ 此帖被olu在2017-05-25 14:02重新编辑 ]
  
  
  

 
 
顶端 Posted: 2017-05-23 16:16 | [楼 主]
帖子浏览记录 版块浏览记录
中国文革研究网 » CR STUDIES
 
 

Total 0.008012(s) query 3, Time now is:09-27 05:40, Gzip enabled
Powered by PHPWind v6.3.2 Certificate © http://wengewang.tk