本页主题: Today's China is weaker than it was in 1966。 How China went from hero to zero? 打印 | 加为IE收藏 | 复制链接 | 收藏主题 | 上一主题 | 下一主题

top
级别: 新手上路


精华: 0
发帖: 31
威望: 41 点
红花: 310 朵
贡献值: 0 点
在线时间:0(小时)
注册时间:2017-09-08
最后登录:2019-03-15

 Today's China is weaker than it was in 1966。 How China went from hero to zero?

If you were to tell people that today's China is weaker than it was in 1966, most people would disagree with you. It's because the media portrays China to be strong, but they do so for their own specific agenda. The same media also portrays North Korea to be a threat, but are they really? I doubt any legitimate military expert would claim that North Korea could really threaten the west or its pupets. The same can be said about China. Although you can regularly see China's new weapons on display, this does not mean China is strong. Remember, the USSR also had very advanced weaponry, however, this couldn't save the USSR, and won't save China.

in recent decades, we've witnessed the u.s spend billions to remove the ukrainian leadership for a pro western leadership. this displaced a lot of cooperation with China, and there was a lot of cooperation going on between ukraine and CHina. ukraine was the country that sold China its first aircraft carrier- the lianoning jian. ukraine also provided China with many jet engines used in China's fighter jets. China was behind many agricultural projects in the Ukraine. All this, and more, came to an end in 2014, when the u.s. backed rebels seized control, implementing pro western policies, while anti Chinese/Russian. meanwhile, we've yet to see China overthrow any goverments and replace them with pro Chinese ones. in fact, it's quite the opposite. we've seen the u.s. also successfully install a pro western leader in sri lanka, who put an end to Chinese cooperation. like the ukraine, sri lanka also was cooperating with China before Rajapaksa took power. other examples include the establishment of south sudan, that was created to subvert an indendepedent Sudan who also had a close relation with China. in the case of Sudan, the u.s. has worked for over a dozen years to subvert the Sudan, having successfully fomenting a civil war, and further succeeding at partitioning the country in 2011, denying China of an ally, and also natural resources. Libya was another tragedy. in the same year, the west also backed a civil war in Libya. like the others, Libya also had a decent relationship with China, so decent that there were 30,000 Chinese working in Libya. once again, america was not happy with seeing an independent Libya and had to strike. the west backed terorists in Libya, bombed the country, and killed its leaders. country by country, we've seen the west disrupt countries that were cooperative with China. on the other hand, China hasn't been able to prevent any of this from hapening, nor has China retaliated against the west for this. in fact, it's quite the opposite. not only is China unable to defend its interests abroad, China has even offered the west MORE concesions, rewarding the disruptions. For the past 70 years, Myanmar had been a Chinese ally. Needless to say, for the past 70 years, the Myanmar air force has never bombed China, however, in 2015, the Myanmar air force bombed China. Ever since Myanmar's independence in 1948, the west has been trying to recolonize it, just as japan recolonized taiwan. As usual, the west used terorism that failed for many decades. However, faced with a weakening China, the west was on a rampage to take over the world. In 2007, the west launched a people powered coup, similar to the kind in the ukraine, and elsewhere. Prior to this, the west had threatened to invade Myanmar if they did not surrender. So, in 2007, they surrendered, but not completely. The formerly pro Chinese leadership made concesions to the pro western clique led by Aung San Su Kyi. By 2015, the west had made significant gains into the Myanmar goverment, therefore, it was able to arrange a bombing on China to ruin the China-Myanmar relation, something not previously possible. A year later, western backed politician Aung was able to seize the position as the State Counsellor of Myanmar. As the west continues to regularly split independent sovereign countries to imperialism, China has largely been unable to make many gains in western pupet regimes such as japan. Can anyone imagine China being able to partition off japan into north and south japan? with one of them being pro Chinese? It would be unimaginable, but not only is it imaginable for the west to do this in Sudan, it's a reality that everyone has come to accept, whether it be the partioning of korea, or iraq.
They say that China had been humiliated for a century. I ask did the humiliation really stop?
China was further humilitated when a famous disident (chen guangcheng) was freed from house arrest under american pressure. He made all the headlines. He had previously been convicted of subversion. the west liked him, and the u.s demanded that he be freed and sent to the u.s.. China gave in and let him go. I wonder if China would ever be able to make such a demand and force the u.s regime to free a prisoner? This has never hapened in recent history.
[ 此帖被top在2019-03-15 01:05重新编辑 ]
  
  
  

 
 
顶端 Posted: 2018-12-09 17:29 | [楼 主]
top
级别: 新手上路


精华: 0
发帖: 31
威望: 41 点
红花: 310 朵
贡献值: 0 点
在线时间:0(小时)
注册时间:2017-09-08
最后登录:2019-03-15

 

Chinese patriots proudly claim that foreign invaders have always been sinicized. In other words, Chinese culture was so strong that it couldn't be faded. Chinese nationalists believed foreigners were generally so impressed by Chinese culture that foreigners abandoned their own culture to adopt Chinese customs. The Manchus, and Mongols both did it. However, for the first time in history, we are seeing the opposite. No one has really invaded China in the past few decades, but we are witnessing history being made. Chinese culture has faded away, and being replaced by western culture. There is no longer Chinese styles of clothing, and Chinese people are in race to see who can be the most westernized. In terms of names, Chinese are weaker than even their Indian counter parts. Very few Indians will call themselves "Joe". However, you will see many Chinese adopting western names, particularly in hong kong, and taiwan.

and  Through China's 5000 year history,
The Chinese cultural situation is so pathetic that even former colonies like Nigeria wear their own traditional clothes where China's traditional clothes have all but disapeared, whether in hong kong, taiwan, or the mainland.



    CONTRARY TO POPULAR BELIEF, CHINA MAY BE GETTING WEAKER, NOT STRONGER. IN ORDER TO KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON IN CHINA, WE MUST EXAMINE TWO PARTS OF CHINESE HISTORY. FIRSTLY, FROM LIBERATION UNTIL 1976, SECONDLY, FROM 1976 ONWARD. IMPORTANT DISCOVERIES CAN BE MADE BY COMPARING THE MEDIA FROM THESE TWO ERAS SEPARATELY. LOOKING AT SOME CHINESE ARTICLES FROM 1949-1978, WE SEE STRONG LANGUAGE, AND CHINA COMING FROM A POSITION OF STRENGTH. AFTER THAT, WE NOTICE THE LANGUAGE WEAKEN AS CHINA MOVES INTO A POSITION OF CAPITULATION, NOT ONLY BY ALLOWING WESTERN EXPLOITERS BACK INTO CHINA, BUT ALSO SURRENDERING ITS GLOBAL PEOPLES WAR, TWO OF THE MOST IMPORTANT PILLARS OF CHINESE SOCIETY DURING THE LIBERATED ERA.
    AT FIRST, CHINA CLAIMED IT WOULD LIBERATE TAIWAN, AND CHINA DID MAKE ATTEMPTS TO DO THIS. AFTER DENG SEIZED POWER, HE TALKED ABOUT UNIFYING TAIWAN, GIVING UP ON THE IDEA OF LIBERATION. THIS OF COURSE WAS THE SAME DENG WHO REENSLAVED THE MAINLAND. THE IDEA WAS, HE WOULD BE HAPPY WITH CORE POWER BEING IN THE HANDS OF THE INPERIALISTS, AS LONG AS TAIWAN PAID LIP SERVICE TO THE CENTRAL GOVERMENT. CERTAINLY THIS WAS HIS APPROACH TO HONG KONG, WHO IS MORE ANTI CHINESE TODAY THAN EVER BEFORE. SEVERAL GENERATIONS AFTER DENG, THE LEADERSHIP IS TALKING ABOUT ONE COUNTRY, TWO SYSTEMS, WITH NO REAL UNIFICATION, AND CERTAINLY NO LIBERATION. DURING THE COMUNIST ERA, LEADERS REJECTED THE IDEA OF AN ROC (REPUBLIC OF CHINA) REGIME, HOWEVER, IN 2017, LEADERS ARE ACTUALLY CONSIDERING AN ROC REGIME EXIST ALONGSIDE THE PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF CHINA, EVENTHOUGH THIS IDEA IS LOOKED DOWN UPON BY SOME LEADERS. NONETHELESS, THERE ARE PEOPLE IN THE LEADERSHIP WHO WILL AT LEAST ENTERTAIN THE IDEA OF AN ROC REGIME RESURFACING. THIS IS A HUGE SIGN OF CAPITULATION ON THE CENTRAL GOVERMENT'S BEHALF.
    BEFORE WE CAN UNDERSTAND WHAT ALL THIS MEANS, WE MUST EXAMINE WHAT SOME OF THE TERMINOLOGY ACTUALLY MEANS. WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO LIBERATE SOMETHING? IT GENERALLY IMPLIES FULL POLITICAL TRANSFORMATION. FOR EXAMPLE, CHANGING FROM CAPITALISM TO COMUNISM. IN TAIWAN'S CASE, THE KMT, AND ROC WOULD GIVE UP ALL ITS POSITIONS AND BE REPLACED BY COMUNISTS. MAINLANDERS WOULD BE FREE TO TRAVEL TO AND FROM TAIWAN. MEDIA, EDUCATION, MILITARY, MARKETS, CUSTOMS, ECONOMICS WOULD ALL BE UNIFIED.
UNFORTUNATELY, LIBERATION AS AN IDEA HAS DIED AFTER CAPITALISM PREVAILED. THE IDEA OF LIBERATION LASTED UNTIL ABOUT THE DENG ERA, WHEN DENG MADE HUGE CAPITULATIONS ON MANY LEVELS, FROM THE GLOBAL PEOPLES WAR, TO COMUNIST IDEOLOGY, TO THE EXPLOITATION OF CHINESE BY FOREIGNERS. HE EVEN INVADED VIET NAM ON BEHALF OF HIS WESTERN MASTERS. ALTHOUGH DENG WAS UNPOPULAR ALREADY, GIVING UP TAIWAN WOULD MAKE HIM EVEN LESS POPULAR, AS MUCH AS HIS WESTERN MASTERS WOULD LIKE HIM TO DO SO. BESIDES, ALLOWING TAIWAN TO BE OVERTAKEN BY THE WEST IS NOT TO THE ADVANTAGE OF EVEN COMPRADORES LIKE DENG, BECAUSE TAIWAN WOULD BE, AND HAS BEEN USED TO DESTABILIZE CHINA, INCLUDING DENG'S OWN REGIME. SO DENG GAVE UP THE IDEA OF LIBERATION, NOT THAT HE COULD LIBERATE TAIWAN EVEN IF HE WANTED TO. ONE THING TO NOTE IS THOUGH, THE USAGE OF THE TERM UNIFICATION IMPLIES A WEAKENING OF CHINA, AND DOES NOT COMMAND THE KIND OF POWER, OR RESPECT THAT LIBERATION WOULD. NOW IF WE LOOK FURTHER INTO THE TERM UNIFICATION, IT'S MUCH MORE OF A GREY AREA, BECAUSE UNIFICATION CAN MEAN MANY THINGS. ONE THING'S FOR SURE, IT WAS NOT AS CLEAR CUT AS LIBERATION, AND IMPLIED THAT THE FORMER RULING CLASS OF TAIWAN MAY BE ABLE TO KEEP THEIR POWER. UNDER THIS PROPOSED MODEL, TAIWAN POLITICIANS WOULD PROBABLY BE ABSORBED INTO THE "COMUNIST" PARTY, AND ALLOWED TO CONTINUE THEIR REIGN UNDER THE DIRECTION OF DENG AS THE SUPREME LEADER, AND THE ROC/KMT WOULD CEASE TO EXIST, AS OPPOSED TO LIBERATION WHERE THE FORMER RULING CLASS WOULD BE OVERTHROWN, AND REPLACED WITH A NEW ONE, AND THE OLD LEADERS WOULD BE KEPT OUT OF POWER, AND PROBABLY STIGMATIZED. IT WAS ALSO AROUND THIS TIME (DENG ERA) THAT THE MAINLAND BEGAN GIVING CONCESIONS TO NOT ONLY TAIWAN, BUT ALSO HONGERS, WESTERNERS, AND JAPANESE... YET ANOTHER SIGN OF CAPITULATION. BY DOING SO, DENG WAS HOPING TO LURE TAIWAN BACK WITH A CAROT. IT WAS HIS BELIEF THAT IF HE ACTED CAPITALIST, THEN THE TAIWANESE WOULD UNIFY. HE EVEN WENT AS FAR AS FLOODING THE AIRWAVES WITH TAIWANESE MUSIC. OBVIOUSLY WE KNOW NOW THAT HIS PERCEPTION WAS WRONG. DESPITE 40 YEARS OF MISTAKES, THE CENTRAL GOVERMENT STILL CONTINUES THIS POLICY. MEANWHILE, THE ROC REGIME (AT THE REQUEST OF ITS WESTERN MASTERS) BARELY BUDGED, PUTTING STRICT ENFORCEMENTS ON MAINLANDERS ENTERING TAIWAN, AND PUTTING BANS ON MAINLAND PRODUCTS FROM PHONES TO FRUITS. DESPITE DENG'S CAPITULATIONS AND KOWTOWS, THE WEST BEGAN ITS CRUSADE TO DESINICIZE TAIWAN. THE WEST BEGAN TELLING TAIWANESE THAT THEY WEREN'T CHINESE, AND THAT TAIWAN WASN'T A PART OF CHINA. AS YOU CAN SEE, THIS WORKED EXACTLY CONTRARY TO DENG'S ASSUMPTION THAT TAIWAN WOULD WANT TO RETURN TO THE MOTHERLAND. DENG EITHER DIDN'T REALIZE, OR DIDN'T CARE THAT THE WEST CONTROLLED THE TAIWAN MEDIA, AND EDUCATION SECTORS, AND THEREFORE CONTROLLED THE MINDS OF TAIWANESE. MAYBE DENG KNEW ALL THIS, BUT ONLY TALKED OF UNIFICATION TO PAY LIP SERVICE TO THE CHINESE PEOPLE, MAKING IT APPEAR HE HAD THE SITUATION UNDER CONTROL, EVEN THOUGH HE DIDN'T, AND THE WEST WAS INDEED CALLING THE SHOTS.
    THIS IDEA OF USING CAPITALISM AS A WAY TO ATTRACT THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY WAS DOOMED TO FAIL FROM THE VERY BEGINING. EVEN BEFORE LIBERATION, A LOT OF RESEARCH HAD BEEN DONE ON THE SUBJECT, AND IT WAS CONCLUDED THAT THE BOURGEOISIE GRAVITATES TOWARDS INPERIALISM, THEREFORE, IT WOULDN'T MATTER THAT YOU GAVE HONGERS, TAIWANESE, SOUTH KOREANS, JAPANESE, AND SINGAPORE CONCESIONS, IN THE END, THEY WOULD STILL BE LOYAL TO THEIR WESTERN MASTERS. UNTIL TODAY, THIS THEORY HAS PROVEN TRUE. DENG'S DELUSIONAL POLICIES NOT ONLY ALIENATED CHINA FROM THE CAPITALIST WORLD, BUT ALSO THE SOCIALIST WORLD, WHICH LED TO A WAR WITH VIETNAM IN 79. CHINA ALSO CAME UNDER THE CRITICISM OF ENVER HOXHA'S THAT SAME YEAR. THIS LED THE DENGISTS TO COME UP WITH YET ANOTHER FOOLISH THEORY THAT "THERE ARE NO FRIENDS, ONLY INTERESTS", WHICH WAS A 180 FROM MAO'S 3RD WORLD UNITED FRONT. DENGISTS CONCEAL THAT CHINA HAD MANY FRIENDS THROUGHOUT THE THIRD WORLD PRIOR TO DENG'S TENURE, AND IT WAS DENG WHO BURNED THE BRIDGES TO THESE COUNTRIES. THE MOST FAMOUS BRIDGE BURNED WAS WITH ALBANIA. ALTHOUGH DENG, AND HIS COLABORATORS LIKE TO CLAIM THAT CAPITALISM HAS BROUGHT CHINA ALL THESE TREATS, THEY ALWAYS FAIL TO MENTION ALL THAT CHINA HAD LOST AS A RESULT OF CAPITALISM, INCLUDING CHINA'S OWN SOVRENTY, AND MOST IMPORTANTLY, POPULAR SUPPORT.

BY THE TIME 97 ROLLED AROUND, THE DENGISTS SHOWED THEIR WEAKNESS ONCE AGAIN, BY ALLOWING THE BRITISH SYSTEM TO CONTINUE, FURTHER GIVING BILLIONS IN CONCESIONS TO HONGERS, AND FOREIGNERS ALIKE. PERHAPS DENG THOUGHT HE COULD BUY OFF THE JACKALS, BUT 89 SHOWED DENG THAT THE WEST WANTED DENG OUT OF THE PICTURE. IN HONG KONG, THIS SYSTEM OF CAPITULATION, EXPLOITATION, AND HUMILIATION WOULD BE KNOWN AS THE ONE COUNTRY TWO SYSTEMS REGIME. ANYONE WHO'S BEEN TO HONG KONG CAN SEE HOW WESTERNIZED IT IS, AND THE ABSENCE OF CHINESE TRADITIONS AND VALUES. THE DENGISTS GAVE THE WEST MORE CONTROL OVER THE OPERATIONS IN HONG KONG THAN CHINA. DENGISTS ARE THOSE WHO SUBSCRIBE TO DENGISM. SOME OF THE CORE VALUES OF DENGISM IS TO ACCOMODATE THE WEST, EMBRACE CAPITALISM, AND SUPRES CHINESE PRIDE. THIS IS WHY YOU HAVE SO MANY PEOPLE WHO WORSHIP THE WEST IN CHINA, NOT ONLY IN HONG KONG AND TAIWAN, BUT INCREASINGLY ON THE MAINLAND AS WELL. KEEP IN MIND, THIS IDEA OF WORSHIPPING THE WEST WAS NOT A MAINSTREAM PHENOMENON FROM 49-76. THIS IS WHY ITS INCORPORATED INTO DENGISM AS IT DID NOT TAKE PRECENDENCE UNTIL AFTER DENG MADE HIS COMEBACK. THE MEDIA, OF COURSE, CENSORS OUT THE ENTIRE COMUNIST ERA WHEN THE CHINESE ACTUALLY TOOK PRIDE IN THEMSELVES, AND SAW NO NEED TO TRY AND BE WESTERN. THE LAST THING THE WEST AND ITS COLABORATORS WANT IS TO SHINE LIGHT ON THAT ERA, BUT THE FACT REMAINS THAT IT WAS ONE OF THE MOST, IF NOT THE MOST GLORIOUS TIMES IN CHINESE, AND QUITE POSSIBLY HUMAN HISTORY. IT'S FUNNY HOW MANY REGIMES IN THE WEST CALL THEMSELVES PROGRESIVE, BUT THEY ARE NOTHING COMPARED TO HOW PROGRESIVE CHINA WAS IN 1966. IT'S ALSO QUITE PATHETIC THAT WE ACTUALLY HAVE TO LOOK BACK IN TIME TO LOOK FOR PROGRES, INDICATING THAT WE AS HUMANS HAVE MOVED BACKWARDS.
    "SCHOLARS" CLAIM THERE WAS A CENTRY LONG HUMILIATION OF CHINA, HOWEVER, THIS ISN'T A THING OF THE PAST. WHAT IS NOT TALKED ABOUT IS THE HUMILIATION PICKING UP AGAIN IN 1978, RIGHT WHERE IT LEFT OFF IN 1949. THE REASON THE MEDIA DEPICTS IT THIS WAY IS BECAUSE THE DENGISTS ENABLED THE WEST TO MAKE MONEY AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CHINESE WORKING CLASS. THIS EXPLOITATION OF CHINA ENABLED THE WEST TO GREATLY EXPAND ITS INFLUENCE, EVEN CRUSHING THE USSR IN THE PROCES. RECOGNIZING DENG'S CRIMES AGAINST THE CHINESE PEOPLE WOULD ALSO DISCREDIT THE WEST'S GOLDEN BOY, DENG. ALTHOUGH THE WEST RECOGNIZES HONG KONG AS BEING PART OF CHINA, IT IS THE WEST WHO DECIDES HOW THE CITY IS RUN FROM DAY TO DAY. WHAT IS FUNNY IS THAT DESPITE ALL THAT DENG HAD DONE FOR THE WEST (INCLUDING INVADE VIETNAM), THE WEST STILL TRIED TO OVERTHROW DENG IN 1989 WITH WHAT IS LABLED AS THE "TIANEMEN MASSACRE". HOW STUPID MUST DENG HAVE FELT ON JUNE 4TH? PROBABLY AS STUPID AS KRUSCHEV FELT WHEN CHAIRMAN MAO TEAMED UP WITH THE WEST AGAINST THE USSR. WHEN CHINA TRIED TO ASSERT SMALL AMOUNTS OF CONTROL OVER THE CITY, THE WEST RESPONDED BY ORGANIZING SEVERAL PROTESTS. THE WEST WAS PARTICULARLY ANGERED WHEN THE CHINESE TRIED TO INTRODUCE SMALL LEVELS OF PATRIOTISM IN ITS SCHOOLS. THE IDEA IS THAT ANYTHING SHORT OF WORSHIPPING THE WEST IN HK SCHOOLS WAS UNACCEPTABLE. THE SECOND WELL KNOWN PROTEST HAPPENED WITH THE "OCCUPY CENTRAL" MOVEMENT WHICH SPIRALED INTO A SERIES OF RIOTS. THIS RIOT IS VERY INTERESTING AS IT REMINDS US OF THE 67 RIOTS IN HONG KONG, WITH ONE VERY FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCE. THE 67 RIOTS WERE AGAINST THE BRITISH AND PRO CHINESE. THE OCCUPY CENTRAL RIOTS WERE ANTI CHINESE, AND PRO WESTERN IN NATURE. THIS JUXTAPOSITION IS A REMINDER OF HOW POWER HAS TURNED 180 DEGREES. CHINA'S POWER PEAKED IN 69, WHEN IT WAS ABLE TO EXERT ITS INFLUENCE INTO ALL CORNERS OF THE GLOBE, BACKING INDPENDENCE MOVEMENTS, WHEREAS CHINA IS IN A LARGELY DEFENSIVE POSITION TODAY. TODAY, CHINA PRACTICES A NON INTERFERENCE POLICY, SHOWCASING CHINA'S WEAKNESS. MANY PEOPLE TRY TO EMULATE THE WEST, HOPING TO BECOME AS "SUCCESSFUL" AS THE WEST, HOWEVER, THESE PRETENDERS DON'T COME THROUGH WHERE IT MATTERS MOST. THE WEST'S POWER COMES THROUGH THE BAREL OF A GUN, AND YOU FIND PEOPLE ACROSS THE WORLD DRINKING COFFEE; LISTENING TO ROCK N ROLL; PLAYING GOLF; AND EATING FRIED CHICKEN, AS IF THAT IS SUPPOSED TO PROPEL YOU INTO SUCCESS. FEW PEOPLE WANT TO UNDERSTAND THAT WESTERN POWER DOESN'T COME FROM DRINKING COKE, OR CHEWING BUBBLE GUM, IT COMES FROM INTERFERENCE IN FOREIGN AFFAIRS, BACKING ARMED MOVEMENTS; TOTALITARIAN CONTROL ON THE FLOW OF INFORMATION; AND USING VIOLENCE BY ANY MEANS NECESARY. THIS IS THE CORE OF WESTERN POWER.
    IF YOU WANT TO KNOW WHO RUNS A CITY, LOOK AT WHAT WEBSITES ITS CITIZENS ARE USING. WE ALL KNOW THAT ON THE INTERNET, THERE ARE ESSENTIALLY TWO SPHERES. AN AMERICAN SPHERE, WHICH DOMINATES 99% OF THE WORLD, AND THE CHINESE SPHERE, HAVING INFLUENCE ON THE MAINLAND, AND ACUTELY ABROAD. THE MAIN CHINESE SEARCH ENGINE IS BAIDU, HOWEVER, IT IS NOT WIDELY USED IN HONG KONG. SO IF THEY'RE NOT USING BAIDU, GUESS WHAT THEY'RE USING? GOOGLE, OF COURSE. WHO CONTROLS GOOGLE? THE U.S.. THIS PLACES THE CONTROL OF INFORMATION FIRMLY IN THE WEST. TO MAKE MATTERS WORSE, THE WEST NOT ONLY CONTROLS THE GATEWAY TO ALL INFORMATION, BUT ALSO THE MESSENGER PROGRAMS SUCH AS WHATSAPP, AND SOCIAL NETWORKS SUCH AS FACEBOOK. WHEN YOU CONTROL THE INFORMATION, YOU CONTROL THE MINDS. THIS IS WHAT THE WEST IS DOING IN HONG KONG. NOT ONLY DOES THE WEST CONTROL THE FLOW OF INFORMATION BUT KNOWS EVERYTHING ABOUT HONGERS, SUCH AS WHO THEIR FRIENDS ARE, WHO THEY CONTACT, AND WHAT THEIR HABITS ARE, ONCE AGAIN GIVING ABSOLUTE POWER AND CONTROL TO THE WEST. IF YOU STUDY THE COLLAPSE OF THE SOVIET UNION, YOU WILL NOTICE THAT THE WEST HAD TO FIRST INFLUENCE THE IDEOLOGY OF SOVIETS IN ORDER TO DESTROY THE SOVIET UNION AS A COUNTRY. IT'S OBVIOUS THAT THE WEST HAS A MUCH STRONGER FOOTHOLD IN HONG KONG THAN IT HAD IN THE SOVIET UNION, THEREFORE, BRINGING HONG KONG TO ITS KNEES SHOULD NOT BE VERY DIFFICULT FOR WESTERN LEADERS. IN ADDITION TO CONTROLLING THE INFORMATION IN HONG KONG, THE WEST ALSO CONTROLS A LOT OF WHAT IS BEING TAUGHT IN HONG KONG SCHOOLS, AND THE AGENDA IS USUALLY PRO WESTERN, AND ANTI CHINESE, WHICH IS WHY MANY OF THE OCCUPY CENTRAL LEADERS WERE FROM THE EDUCATION COMMUNITY, IE PROFESORS, AND TEACHERS. THE OCCUPY CENTRAL MOVEMENT ALSO SHOWS THE FAILURE OF CHINA SINCE 1976, AS THE CENTRAL GOVERMENT HAD NEARLY 20 YEARS TO TURN HONG KONG AROUND, BUT HAVE MADE VERY LITTLE GAINS. LANGUAGE CAN BE A VERY GOOD INDICATOR OF THIS. HONGERS CONTINUE TO SPEAK CANTONESE, AS COMPARED TO CHINESE OF OTHER PROVINCES SPEAKING FAIRLY DECENT MANDARIN. EVEN ETHNIC MONGOLS, AND KOREANS ARE NOW SPEAKING BETTER MANDARIN. THE FAILURE OF THE CENTRAL GOVERMENT TO PROPERLY EDUCATE HONGERS IS AN EXAMPLE OF HOW ONE COUNTRY TWO SYSTEMS IS A DISADVANTAGE TO CHINA, GIVING THE WEST AN ABSOLUTE UPPERHAND. ESSENTIALLY WHAT CHINA HAS DONE IS ALLOW HONG KONG TO CONTINUE AS A BRITISH COLONY, AND CHINA GETS A FEW CONCESIONS HERE AND THERE IN THE CITY.
    IF YOU EXAMINE THE MARKET, YOU WILL NOTICE THAT MANY CHINESE GOODS ARE ACTUALLY UNAVILABLE IN HONG KONG, SUCH AS DOMESTIC SNEAKERS FROM THE MAJOR BRANDS LIKE LINING. EVEN MAINLAND WEBSITES DONT SHIP TO HONG KONG. SO GUESS WHO FILLS THE VACUUM? YEP. YOU GUESSED IT, THE WEST, AND ITS PUPETS. WHAT YOU WILL FIND TO BE MUCH MORE READILY AVAILABLE ON THE HONG KONG MARKET ARE EXPENSIVE IMPORTS COMING FROM THE USA, EUROPE, AUSTRALIA, JAPAN, AND SOUTH KOREA. NIKE, NEW BALANCE, AND LG PHONES ARE FLOODING THE MARKET, BUT LINING'S; 361 SHOES; AND GIONEE PHONES ARE NOWHERE TO BE FOUND. THE ONE COUNTRY TWO SYSTEMS PROGRAM HAS ERECTED BARRIERS FOR DOMESTIC PRODUCTS WHILE GIVING A FREE PASS TO IMPORTS FROM HOSTILE REGIMES WHO HAVE A VESTED INTEREST IN THE COLLAPSE OF CHINA, JUST AS THEY DID DURING THE 8 NATION ALLIANCE. HOSTILE REGIMES HAVE THE UPPER HAND IF NOT AN ABSOLUTE MONOPOLY ON PRODUCTS RANGING FROM BACKPACKS TO MEAT IN SUPERMARKETS. IN THIS SENSE, AND MANY SENSES, ALLOWING WESTERN CORPORATIONS (AND PUPETS) TO PROFIT OFF OF CHINA IS A MAJOR DISADVANTAGE AND WILL ACCELERATE THE COLLAPSE OF CHINA, JUST AS IT HAD DONE TO THE QING DURING THE OPIUM WARS, EXCEPT THIS TIME, ITS NOT OPIUM THATS DOING CHINA IN, IT'S STARBUCKS; NIKES; IPHONES; AND NOT TO MENTION CHINESE TOURISM & EXCHANGE STUDENTS (VIA TUITION IN THE BILLIONS) IN HOSTILE REGIMES. IF THE INPERIALISTS SAY THAT AN ARMS RACE IS WHAT DID THE SOVIET UNION IN, THEY WE CAN ASSUME THAT STUDYING\VACATIONING IN THE WEST; IPHONES; STARBUCKS; AND KFC WILL BE WHAT DOES CHINA IN.
    IF THIS IS WHAT CHINA PROPOSES FOR TAIWAN, THEN WHAT IS THE POINT OF UNIFYING UNDER THESE TERMS?  AS IF CHINA HASN'T ALREADY BEEN HUMILIATED ENOUGH SINCE 1978, UNIFYING A PROVINCE, AND THEN ALLOWING WESTERN BACKED HATE GROUPS TO CONTINUE OPERATING, IS JUST ASKING FOR TROUBLE, AND ANOTHER WAY TO EMBARAS CHINA, AND CHINESE PEOPLE FURTHERMORE ON THE INTERNATIONAL STAGE. NOT ONLY HAS CHINA NOT LEARNED ANY LESSONS FROM THE HONG KONG, AND MACAO FAILURES, BUT IT HAS THE NERVE TO PROPOSE A SIMILAR SYSTEM FOR TAIWAN. ONE REALLY HAS TO WONDER WHO THE POLITBURO IS SERVING, THE WEST? OR THE CHINESE PEOPLE. THE ONE COUNTRY TWO SYSTEMS DEAL IS THE WORST THING THAT ANY COUNTRY CAN ASK FOR, BECAUSE ESSENTIALLY WHAT YOU ARE PROPOSING IS THAT THE WEST CONTROLS THE MARKETS, EDUCATION, MEDIA, AND INTERNET, WHILE THE TERRITORY IS NOMINALLY YOURS. WHAT I HAVE WITNESSED IN HONG KONG IS THAT IT IS PROBABLY ONE OF THE MOST ANTI CHINESE CITIES I'VE EVER VISITED, MORE SO THAN EVEN LANGLEY, OR THE CITY OF LONDON. OF COURSE WHAT THE WEST IS HOPING FOR IS THAT THE HATRED WILL BOIL OVER INTO THE MAINLAND, AND SPREAD, THEREBY CREATING A COLLAPSE. THIS IS PRETTY MUCH WHAT HAPPENED IN THE SOVIET UNION, AND MAYBE IT WILL HAPPEN IN CHINA TOO. WHO KNOWS? BUT IF IT DOES HAPPEN, YOU WILL KNOW WHY.
    LET'S PUT EVERYTHING INTO CONTEXT. IF WE ARE TO UNDERSTAND CHINA'S CAPITULATION ON THE WORLD STAGE, WE MUST COMPARE IT TO OTHER CONFLICTS IN THE WORLD. IN 2014, THE WEST DECIDED THAT THERE WAS TOO MUCH COOPERATION BETWEEN UKRAINE AND RUSSIA, AND THAT WAS UNACCEPTABLE TO WESTERN LEADERS. IN THE EYES OF THE WEST, THE BREAKUP OF USSR SHOULD RESULT IN FRAGMENTATION, NOT COOPERATION. VIWEING RUSSIA AS AN OPPONENT, THE WEST SOUGHT TO WEAKEN RUSSIA AND RUSSIAN INFLUENCE, AND OR PERHAPS THE WEST NEEDED UKRAINE AS ITS OWN PERSONAL PAWN FOR EXPANDING WESTERN INFLUENCE WORLDWIDE.  THE WEST RESPONDED BY OVERTHROWING THE LEGITIMATE LEADERSHIP OF THE UKRAINE, AND REPLACED IT WITH A PRO WESTERN ONE. UKRAINIANS AREN'T EVEN ALLOWED TO SPEAK RUSSIAN ANYMORE. CAN YOU IMAGINE CHINA GOING INTO HONG KONG AND SAYING YOU CAN'T SPEAK CANTONESE? I KNOW, NEITHER CAN I. IN THIS ASPECT, THE WEST IS COMING FROM A POSITION OF POWER. THE WEST DOES NOT TOLERATE ANYTHING SHORT OF A PUPPET. CHINA, ON THE OTHER HAND SEEMS TO BE IN A POSITION OF WEAKNESS, THAT IS WHY ENGLISH STILL HOLDS THE LEVEL OF PRESTIGE IT DOES IN HONG KONG AND REMAINS ONE OF THE OFFICIAL LANGUAGES OF THE CITY EVEN AFTER 20 YEARS OF SUPPOSED UNIFICATION.
    NOW LET'S CONTRAST THIS TO CHINA. WOULD CHINA, IN 2017, EVER ATTEMP TO OVERTHROW A REGIME WHO HAD CLOSE COOPERATION WITH THE WEST? A CLOSE RELATIONSHIP SIMILAR TO HOW RUSSIA, AND UKRAINE COOPERATED IN THE PAST? NOT LIKELY, BECAUSE OF COURSE IF CHINA WERE TO DO THAT TO SOMEONE, THE FIRST ONE TO GO WOULD BE JAPAN, BUT TO THE CONTRARY, CHINA HAS TOLERATED AGGRESSIVE PRO WESTERN FACTIONS NOT ONLY IN SOUTH KOREA, JAPAN, HONG KONG, TAIWNAN, BUT EVEN IN THE MAINLAND ITSELF.AND THIS TOLERANCE IS CONTINUING NEARLY 40 YEARS AFTER DENG SEIZED POWER.  CAN YOU IMAGINE CHINA CONDUCTING MILITARY EXERCISES WITH CUBA ON A MONTHLY BASIS OFF THE COAST OF FLORIDA? I KNOW, NEITHER CAN I, BUT THIS IS WHAT THE WEST DOES WITH SOUTH KOREA, JAPAN, AND SINGAPORE. IT'S OBVIOUS THAT CHINA IS ACCEPTING MOST TERMS SET BY THE WEST, AND ACCEPTING A TAIWAN THAT IS CONTROLLED BY THE WEST. DESPITE WESTERN INFLUENCE EXPANDING EACH DAY, THERE ARE NO COMPLAINTS FROM THE CHINESE MEDIA ABOUT THIS. IT'S DIFFICULT TO SAY IF CHINA IS SIMPLY AFRAID OF THE WEST, OR SIMPLY DOESN'T CARE ABOUT THE DISINTEGRATION OF CHINA, SIMILAR TO THE GORBACHEV REGIME. OR IS IT BOTH?
    IF CHINA IS INDEED GETTING STRONGER AS THE MEDIA CLAIMS, THEN WHAT EXACTLY IS CHINA DOING WITH ITS STRENGTH? THE MEDIA CLAIMS THAT CHINA WAS WEAK DURING THE COMUNIST ERA, BUT DURING THAT TIME, CHINA WAS ACTIVELY BACKING GUERILAS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD WITH ARMS, AND MILITARY TRAINING. NOT ONLY THAT, CHINA WAS PUBLICIZING IT, AND ENCOURAGING THAT ENCOURAGING EVERYONE TO REVOLT. ONE OF CHINA'S STRENGHTS DURING THE COMUNIST ERA WAS INDEED ITS PROPAGANDA, SOMETHING THAT HAS WEAKENED SIGNIFICANTLY AFTER 1976, THEREBY DIMINISHING CHINA'S OVERALL INFLUENCE AT HOME, AND ABROAD. CONTRAST AND COMPARE TO 2017. CHINA IS BACKING SYRIA, HOWEVER, IT IS DOING SO SECRETLY, AND NOT PUBLICIZING IT.
    FROM THE WAY THE CURRENT SITUATION IS LOOKING, MAINLAND CHINA WOULD BE LUCKY TO STAY ENTACT, LET ALONE UNIFYING TAIWAN UNDER WEAK AND HUMILIATING TERMS. ALTHOUGH, CHINA IS IN A POSITION OF WEAKNESS, NOT ALL IS LOST, AND THERE MAY BE SOME HOPE FOR ITS FUTURE. ALTHOUGH IT'S A LITTLE EARLY TO TELL THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THESE PROGRAMS, SOME OF THE FEW THINGS CHINA HAS DONE RIGHT WAS TO BUILD ISLANDS IN THE SOUTH CHINA SEA; KEEPING THE MEDIA, INTERNET, AND SOFTWARE OUT OF THE HANDS OF THE WEST; KEEP THE RMB LOW; NEW SILK ROAD INITIATIVE; SPACE PROGRAM; AND THE AIIB.
  
  
  

 
 
顶端 Posted: 2018-12-09 17:41 | 1 楼
帖子浏览记录 版块浏览记录
中国文革研究网 » CR STUDIES
 
 

Total 0.021897(s) query 4, Time now is:03-22 14:17, Gzip enabled
Powered by PHPWind v6.3.2 Certificate © http://wengewang.tk